The impact of social class is multifaceted, affecting everything from opportunities to education, training and networking to workplace dynamics, career advancement, income and job security.
Surely an attempt to attract candidates from a lower socio-economic background is a good thing, right? A Camden theatre has recently been loudly criticised on social media for posting a job advert seeking applicants from the “working-class, benefit class, criminal class and/or underclass”. Grouping all of these “classes” together (and to even use the term “underclass”) is highly questionable and we think totally inappropriate and insulting on so many levels. It doesn’t matter that the intention was to be inclusive and to increase minority representation, the impact has been to cause great offence and harm.
A better, more equitable approach would be to develop a hiring criteria that focuses on skills and competencies rather than background, and in particular not on background-related achievements, which may favour those from higher social classes.
The theatre has said they are reviewing their wording and that “the conversation around access to and representation in the arts, and indeed in the media, is a vital one, and we’re committed to continue learning from and contributing to it.”
Clearly, there is a need for continued education on how we understand and refer to class, and also how the intersectionality of social class alongside other layers of identity can create further barriers to opportunity.
So, is it time social class became a protected characteristic under the UK Equality Act 2010?
|